Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So simple it didn't even have package signing until a year or two ago. No thanks.


And ... ?

It currently has package signing, right? What's the problem? I'm confused at how a historical problem that has been fixed even matters when discussing why or why not to use it. It's like saying you wouldn't use OS X because 10.1 didn't support Intel processors.


And SecureApt [1] didn't exist until 2003.

[1]: https://wiki.debian.org/SecureApt




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: