Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> To have this discussion without this specific context is to miss the point entirely.

The first sentence of the article:

> We've enjoyed seeing our social rules spread into other parts of the tech community.

The debate here is around whether or not these rules would work in other environments.



Yeah, and you can't have that discussion without understanding why it works for HS.

By ignoring this context, the parent comment, and your comment here, debate a position that was never posited at all. In some sense you are debating yourselves.


I actually agree, but I think it's a debate worth having.

Clearly, this system works for Hacker School. Kudos.

This system is also being advertised for wider implementation, possibly into communities and companies that all of us are a part of, and any broad social reform deserves a good deal of scrutiny before implementation. A key part of these rules, in particular, is the potential for abuse and the sorts of implications they have on the culture that implements them.


I'd also point out that Hacker School's anti-isms rule is probably a lot _less_ strict than most corporate HR policies.


Being strict and verbose leaves less room for abuse or loopholes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: