I wouldn't phrase it as as "not supported correctly" but rather "Microsoft has had 20 years to fix their broken code, and it's still broken".
Seriously, dude. If you're not doing stuff on the extreme bleeding edge, the same code usually works fine on Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera... everywhere but IE. If there are any changes needed, they're trivial. Only IE requires extensive effort to "support correctly".
Microsoft is a $180 billion company with 100,000 employees. I'm just a guy. If they want their browser to be "supported correctly" they should make it work correctly.
No, I specifically meant "not supported correctly" -- as in, because of UA sniffing, you're given an old obsolete interface despite IE11 supporting the features that site needs.
Seriously, dude. If you're not doing stuff on the extreme bleeding edge, the same code usually works fine on Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera... everywhere but IE. If there are any changes needed, they're trivial. Only IE requires extensive effort to "support correctly".
Microsoft is a $180 billion company with 100,000 employees. I'm just a guy. If they want their browser to be "supported correctly" they should make it work correctly.