Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Art, in its current state, has been fully commercialized in that if you don't have someone who is "in the know," then there is very, very slim chance of being successful. I was briefly in the art world (paintings) and everyone wanted to kiss the successful dealers' asses to get exposure and get a curated exhibition. W/o it, nothing's going to happen. It's sad but that's what it's become.


I think success in art is very much like any other industry. It's part luck, it's part "playing the game", it's part networking, and it's part skill & talent.

I'm a fine artist and would put myself in the "not successful" category. I don't make nearly enough to live off of it but it's inherently something I have to do. I could, and have, done commercial work in the past that I could live off of but I just can't bring myself to feed the content machine.

edit: And although I'm kind of ok with the "not successful" part I think my work is important and should be seen. More than anything my measure of success is to add to culture.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: