Good on you if you don't have time to read the link, but your point doesn't stand if you took a minute to read the linked article. Remaining blissfully, self-righteously uninformed in your name-calling (shaming) routine has no quarter here.
You have somehow contrived that I disagree with you on evil republicans and their wicked focus group-driven shifting of the public conversation! It's a common wickedness in politics that all sides employ that I find distasteful.
I just don't find the bone you're picking here apropos to what I actually said. Sorry I don't feel like playing your emotional appeal to logic game today. Zzzzz.
Your strident insistence now that we somehow disagree on your made-up issue is creeping me out even more. You're projecting, I guess? If you'd take a sec to do a little self-reflection, you'd see something is wrong with your thought process or how you address others or something.
That you can't just confront the creep/groupthink/fascist natures of you and the parent head-on is predictable, but troublesome. Either accept what I said or contest it, don't try to change the subject, it's lazy.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=326
The name change agenda is most often liked to a Republican strategist based on focus groups saying CC was LESS scary than GW.